Kansas Department of Transportation: KDOT/KCE Report Card 2002

"...to provide a statewide transportation system to meet the needs of Kansas."

Quick Search

Advanced Search

KDOT/KCE REPORT CARD -- 2002

Please rate the following from 1 to 4 (1 = Poor; 2 = Needs Improvement; 3 = Average; 4 = Excellent; N/A if not applicable). Please provide comments below each statement as to why/how you rated each item. Please limit comments to approximately 4 lines.

1. Cooperation between KDOT and consulting engineering firms.

2. Communication between KDOT and consulting engineering firms.

3. Quality of consultant engineering plans.

4. Quality of consultant engineering inspection.

5. Quality of consultant surveying.

6. Quality of KDOT project management.

7. Quality/Timeliness of KDOT reviews.

8. Quality of KDOT training/certification at KSU-Salina.

Please rate the following from 1 to 4 (1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree; 4 = Strongly Agree; N/A if not applicable). Please provide comments below each statement as to why/how you rated each item. Please limit comments to approximately 4 lines.

9. Consultants are held accountable for their work.

10. Information needed to perform work for KDOT is readily available.

11. KDOT's expectations for consultant work are reasonable.

Please provide written comments on the following:

12. What areas have seen the most improvement in the past two years?

13. What processes should be investigated for improved procedures/requirements?

14. What joint training efforts should the KDOT/KCE Liason Team investigate?

15. What suggestions do you have for improving communication between KDOT and consultants?

16. Other suggestions/comments:

I work for:	KDOT	Private Consultant

My Job Duties are:	Management	Project Manager
	Designer	Surveyor
	Inspector